Weight loss – the anti-aging way

Weight loss – the anti-aging way
by James South MA

Weight loss and dieting is a perennial subject of conversation, TV talk shows, best-selling books, and even trips to the doctor. And no wonder. In spite of the widespread introduction of “low fat”, “no fat”, and “reduced fat” foods and snacks throughout the 1990’s, obesity has reached epidemic proportions in much of the Western world. Obesity (defined as being 20% or more over “ideal” or “normal” weight for one’s size) is now estimated to afflict 35-40% of adults in America. “Common sense” says that the obvious way to avoid or reduce unwanted weight gain is simply to eat less calories.

Since carbohydrates (sugars and starches) and protein each provide only 4 calories (of energy content) per gram, while fat provides 9 calories per gram, and since it’s those unsightly bulges of fat we want to avoid or rid ourselves of to begin with – then just reduce the fat in one’s diet, and slimness is “just a bite away.”

Unfortunately, this “common sense” approach to weight (fat) loss misses the mark in many ways. One hint should be obvious from the way that cattle, hogs and other livestock are fed to rapidly fatten them up at feedlots just before slaughter. Are they fed lard, dairy fat, vegetable oil, margarine, etc.? No. They are fed corn to rapidly fatten them up! Yet corn contains less than 5% fat – it is almost 90% carbohydrate. And what about those “low fat” foods widely introduced during the very 1990’s decade when America’s incidence of obesity increased by a whopping 30-40%? While some were lower fat dairy products and leaner cuts of meats, most of these nouveau “foods” were low-fat cereals, pasta, cookies, snack bars, corn and potato chips, cakes, ice creams, etc. Virtually all of these (high profit) manufactured “foods” are high in sugar/starch and low in protein.

Then there is the so-called “French paradox.” The French are significantly less afflicted than America with heart disease and obesity – both conditions allegedly produced by an excessive fat intake, yet the French eat comparable amounts of meat and fish, four times as much butter, and twice as much cheese (all fat-rich foods) as Americans. Interestingly, the French consume only about 18% as much sugar as Americans. (1)

By now, dear reader, you should be getting the hint that obesity is far more related to carbohydrate consumption than fat intake. Yet even obese people have only 1-2 pounds of carbohydrate stored in their body, as glycogen – a muscle/liver – stored starch. So how can a high carbohydrate, reduced fat diet promote weight gain among Americans, while a high fat, low sugar diet doesn’t fatten Frenchmen nearly as much?

The answer lies not with the dietary ingredients themselves, but rather in the hormonal and biochemical reactions these metabolically different food categories (fat, carbohydrate, protein) elicit in the human body. And the chief hormonal culprit in promoting excess body fat (technically called “white adipose tissue”) is – Insulin.

THE INSULIN – GLUCAGON FAT CONNECTION

Insulin is a large polypeptide hormone secreted by the beta-cells of the pancreas. Insulin release is directly controlled by dietary factors. “Glucose [blood sugar] is the principal stimulus to insulin secretion in human beings…. Insulin lowers the concentration of glucose in blood by inhibiting hepatic [liver] glucose production and by stimulating the uptake of glucose by muscle and adipose tissue…. Under normal conditions, insulin inhibits lipolysis [the breakdown of stored body fat for use as organ/muscle fuel], stimulates fatty acid synthesis [from both sugars and fats]… and decreases the hepatic concentration of carnitine [carnitine “shuttles” fatty acids into mitochondria in most cells for use as ATP energy fuel].” (2)

“Insulin stimulates the fat cells to take up fat and sugar from the blood and store it away as body fat, especially in the middle of the body, within the abdomen and around the vital organs.” (3) “Overweight people tend to have higher basal [baseline] levels of insulin; hyperinsulinemia [high blood insulin] which promotes lipogenesis [fat-formation].” (4)

Insulin is the chief hormone the body uses to lower excessively high blood sugar. The entire bloodstream of a normal, non-diabetic human contains less than 5 grams – a level teaspoonful – of glucose at any one time. It is thus relatively easy to stimulate a rapid rise in blood sugar through sugar – food ingestion. Eating a candy bar or drinking a soft drink will normally raise blood sugar – and blood insulin – within minutes. And while starch foods (starches are chains of sugar molecules, broken down during digestion) may be slightly slower to raise blood sugar and insulin, the modern industrialized starches, such as white flour and finely ground corn meal, used to make pasta, bread, cakes, corn chips and tortillas, crackers, cookies, etc., are digested and absorbed almost as quickly as simple sugar foods.

Insulin has a hormonal partner in regulating and fine-tuning blood sugar levels – glucagon, also secreted by the pancreas. “The secretion of glucagon is regulated by dietary glucose, insulin, amino acids, and fatty acids; glucose is a potent [glucagon] inhibitor…. [The metabolic effects of glucagon] are normally opposed by insulin, and when equivalent equations of both hormones are present, insulin is predominant.” (2) “Glucagon levels are largely determined by the amount of incoming dietary protein, just as insulin levels are strongly related to the amount of incoming carbohydrate.” (7) Just as insulin lowers high blood sugar, glucagon raises low blood sugar – especially important when we skip meals, exercise severely, fast, starvation diet, etc.

Insulin and glucagon also have opposing actions on two key enzymes which control the fate of fat in the body (stored body fat, dietary fat, or fat made in the liver/fat cells from carbohydrates under the stimulus of insulin). “Residing on the surface of the fat cells are two enzymes – both regulated by insulin and glucagon – responsible for herding fat into or out of the fat cells. The first, lipoprotein lipase [LPL], transports fatty acids into the fat cell and keeps them there…. The other, hormone-sensitive lipase [HSL], does just the opposite – it releases the fat from fat cells into the blood [where it is then transported to other cells to be “burned” as fuel]…. insulin stimulates the activity of lipoprotein lipase, the fat-storage enzyme, and glucagon inhibits it; glucagon stimulates the fat-releasing hormone [HSL], and insulin inhibits it.” (3) “The adipose tissue enzyme [LPL] is highly sensitive to variations in the metabolic state, being rapidly increased by oral glucose, by high carbohydrate diet and after usual meals. On the other hand, the LPL activity in adipose tissue decreases when plasma insulin is low as in diabetes and during caloric restriction [and on a low carbohydrate diet].” (5)

As the Drs. Eades note in their book Protein Power: “By altering the ratio of insulin to glucagon – which we can do through our selection of foods -we can determine which pathway predominates. Instead of allowing our [fat] biochemistry to control us, we can control it…. In the insulin-dominant mode, fat storage prevails. In the glucagon-dominant mode…, fat flows away from the fat cells. Fat released from the fat cells enters the other cells and gets shuttled into the mitochondria, where it is completely burned for cellular energy. Along with this fat from the fat cells any dietary fat – whether consumed as fat or converted from carbohydrate or protein – also flows into the mitochondria for oxidation instead of into the fat cells to be stored.”

The chief dietary stimulant for insulin release is carbohydrate (CHO); the chief stimulant for glucagon release is protein. The chief activator of body fat – promoting LPL is insulin; the chief LPL-inhibitor is glucagon. Without high insulin/LPL activity, dietary fat will not end up as stored fat. To get a clear sense of the central necessity of insulin to promote fat storage, consider the fate of the untreated Type I diabetic, whose pancreas has (more or less) completely ceased secreting insulin. Even on a high carbohydrate/fat diet, such a diabetic will continually lose fat (and muscle, as well), and may even lose 30-40 pounds in a month. Without insulin, even a high fat/high carbohydrate diet will not cause fat gain, nor will a high fat diet even prevent loss of existing fat stores. But when dietary fat is combined with large amounts of dietary carbohydrate which activates both insulin and LPL, then much of both the fat carbohydrate ends up as stored body fat.

The National Research Council (USA) reported in 1985 that the average American diet was 46% carbohydrate calories, 43% fat calories, and only 11% protein. (3) Thus it should be obvious that the typical American diet is also an optimal diet for promoting obesity.

Even though all carbohydrates have some tendency to stimulate insulin release, some are worse than others. Carbohydrate research expert Sheldon Reiser has reported that when human volunteers were given drinks or meals calculated to contain 50 grams of glucose, “… glucose and insulin responses were 35-65% lower when starch was the carbohydrate source than when either glucose or sucrose [white sugar] was the carbohydrate source…. The undesirable effects of sucrose… appears to be due, at least partly, to the metabolic properties of the fructose moiety. [One sucrose molecule is one glucose bonded to one fructose]…. Fructose infusion in humans and rats has been shown to produce large decreases in the ATP content of the liver. [The liver-chief metabolic organ of the body uses 12% of the body’s total ATP energy supply to do its hundreds of metabolic tasks. Anything that seriously lowers liver ATP is by definition a metabolic poison.]…. Neither fructose nor glucose, when given [alone], stimulates insulin as potently as glucose and fructose combined. Since diets rarely contain fructose in the absence of glucose or glucose polymers, small amounts of fructose reaching the general circulation [after meals] could greatly affect insulin secretion…. Numerous studies have shown a relationship between insulin levels… and blood triglyceride levels…. Studies in both rats and humans have demonstrated that fructose is more readily converted into lipogenic [fat-forming] substrate than is glucose….

As might be expected on the basis of its more lipogenic metabolism, fructose appears to be incorporated into blood triglycerides more rapidly than is glucose…. In human studies in which the intake of sucrose has been either eliminated or reduced, significant decreases in fasting serum triglycerides [normally made under the prodding of insulin] occurred…. The feeding of sucrose also appears to produce greater increases in blood triglycerides than does the feeding of glucose or partial starch hydrolysates.” (6)

Thus, natural unrefined starches (especially vegetables) will tend to cause less hyperinsulin responses than sugar-rich foods such as candy, cake, pie, doughnuts, soft drinks, sports drinks, etc., as well as natural sugar foods such as dates, figs, dried pineapple, etc.

INSULIN: ACCELERATOR OF AGING

In his 1999 book The Anti-Aging Zone, Barry Sears proposes that there are four chief “pillars of aging” that promote ever-worsening hormonal regulation of and communication between cells, ultimately leading to aging, disease and death. Sears’ four pillars (7) are:

1) Excess insulin
2) Excess cortisol
3) Excess blood glucose
4) Excess free radicals

Many researchers in the past several decades have uncovered evidence supporting insulin’s role as the “chief pillar of aging.” Gerald Reaven is known for his research on “Syndrome X.” This is a syndrome common among sedentary modern Western humans, which involves the strong clustering of hypertension, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, glucose intolerance, obesity, low HDL cholesterol and heart disease. (1) Reaven has shown that the common denominator of the syndrome is hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. As Western peoples age, they tend to develop the condition of insulin resistance, wherein the target cells of insulin – especially the muscle cells – become even more resistant to “hearing the message” of insulin. This in turn lessens the blood sugar-lowering effect of insulin, so that even-smaller amounts of sugar lead to ever-higher blood glucose levels – i.e. glucose intolerance. As cells become more resistant to “hearing” the insulin in an attempt to “bludgeon” the cells into accepting glucose- i.e. hyperinsulinemia.

Insulin is known to cause sodium retention with consequent water retention – hence the hypertension (high blood pressure) connection. As already noted, insulin promotes fat storage in fat cells – i.e. obesity. Insulin stimulates the liver to convert sugar and dietary fats into triglycerides – the form of fat that circulates in the blood and is stored in fat cells – i.e. hypertriglyceridemia. And as R.W. Stout noted in 1985: “The arterial wall is an insulin-sensitive tissue. Insulin promotes proliferation of arterial smooth muscle cells [a beginning phase of atherosclerotic [plaque formation] and enhances lipid synthesis and low-density lipoprotein [LDL] receptor activity. Insulin also promotes experimental atherosclerosis in a number of species.” (1) Insulin-injecting diabetics typically develop atherosclerosis 10 – 20 years earlier than non-insulin-injecting diabetics.

In a 1989 article, “The Deadly Quartet,” M.D. Norman Kaplan reviewed the standard theory that upper-body obesity typically precedes hypertension, glucose intolerance and high triglycerides. Kaplan demonstrates that hyperinsulinemia is the more likely root cause of all four conditions – obesity, glucose intolerance, high triglycerides and hypertension. (1,3)

Two of the other “pillars of aging” – excess cortisol and excess blood glucose – are also intimately tied to excess insulin. As Heleniak and Aston report, “A consequence of obesity is the development of insulin resistance as weight is gained…. Insulin resistance has been induced in normal human subjects by overfeeding. The onset of glucose intolerance may be due to frequent snacking on high energy density foods which prevent insulin levels from returning to normal fasting levels keeping insulin circulating in the blood for a better part of the 24-hour day.” (4) If levels edge chronically higher, cells must become somewhat insulin resistant.

Why?

Because most cells can burn either fat or glucose for fuel, but the brain (under non-fasting conditions) can only burn glucose and typically needs 400 – 500 calories/day of glucose – i.e. about one half the normal total circulating blood sugar. The brain doesn’t need insulin to absorb glucose, giving it a competitive edge over the other 100 – 200 pounds of tissue – unless insulin levels are frequently high.

Thus in order to safeguard the brain’s minute-by-minute blood glucose delivery, other cells must develop insulin resistance when insulin levels are frequently or chronically high, so that they don’t “snatch” all the blood glucose from the hungry brain. The primary hormone that should raise blood sugar to adequately feed the brain is glucagon. But “insulin can act as a glucagon release-inhibiting paracrine hormone,” (2) especially at high concentrations. So then the body goes to “Plan B”: the release of cortisol.

THE INSULIN-CORTISOL CONNECTION

Cortisol comes to the brain’s rescue in two ways. (8) It increases gluconeogenesis – the making of glucose by breaking down proteins from skin, muscle and organ tissue and converting them to glucose in the liver. “Cortisol also causes a moderate decrease in the rate of glucose utilization by cells everywhere in the body” (8) – i.e. cortisol causes insulin resistance!

Thus Sears’ first three pillars of aging – excess insulin, cortisol and blood glucose – are all interlocking and mutually enhancing. And not only does cortisol cannibalize precious body protein to make blood sugar, it also weakens the immune system and damages hippocampal neurons – the very one’s lost in Alzheimer’s disease. (7)

Cortisol also contributes mightily to obesity. “Adrenal corticosteroids also play a role in the development of hypothalamic obesity, gold thioglucose obesity, and dietary obesity. Thus, the substrate for essentially all forms of obesity rests on a foundation of glucocorticoid [i.e. cortisol] secretion from the adrenal gland” (4) .

Cortisol will also be secreted to raise blood sugar in those who frequently skip meals, are fasting, practice “starvation dieting”, or are under severe stress.

INSULIN, cAMP, & EFFECTIVE HORMONAL COMMUNICATION

Most hormones deliver their “message” by interacting with specific receptors on outer cell membrane surfaces, although some do penetrate directly into the cell as well. When hormones bind to their appropriate cellular receptors, they normally activate substances inside the cell known as “second messengers” (the hormone [Ed.- hormone is Latin meaning chemical-messenger] is the first “messenger”). These second messengers actually induce the hormonal biological effect inside the cell. Insulin acts through the second messengers inositol triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG).

Perhaps the commonest second messenger, however, is cyclic AMP (cAMP). “Many hormones do appear to utilize cAMP as a second messenger, including calcitonin, chorionic gonadotrophin, corticotrophin, epinephrine [adrenalin], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], glucagon, luteinizing hormone [LH], lipotrophin, melanocyte-stimulating hormone [MSH], norepinephrine [noradrenaline], parathyroid hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone [TSH], and vasopressin.” (9)

Thus, not only are insulin and glucagon opposite in their basic physiologic actions, they were opposing second messengers: IP3/DAG vs. cAMP. Sears points out that “…if a cell has multiple hormone receptors, then the final biological response of the cell depends on which second messenger system (cAMP or IP3/DAG) predominates at that point in time.” (7) When hormones such as noradrenaline or glucagon bind to their cell membrane receptors, they activate an enzyme called “adenylate cyclase.” This enzyme then produces the cAMP second messenger inside the cell.

Unfortunately insulin opposes cyclic AMP production by adenylate cyclase. (9 Now you can begin to see why Sears considers excessive insulin as the basic pillar of aging. Insulin is one of the few hormones (cortisol being the other major one) which increases with age – most others, such as thyroid, DHEA, testosterone, estrogen, growth hormone, etc. decrease with age.

Now look again at the long list of hormones (and not all of them are listed) which use cAMP as their second messenger, most of which hormones suffer decreased secretion with aging. Since insulin generally increases with age, but opposes cAMP, while most hormones that act through cAMP decrease with age, it is obvious that hyperinsulinemia will tend to distort the overall “symphonic orchestra” of hormone interactions, and thus promote “low fidelity” hormonal communication.

Thus hyperinsulinemia will tend to damage our entire metabolism, because the sum total of the myriad biochemical reactions in our trillions of cells is under the control of our (ideally) tightly synchronized and integrated hormonal “symphonic orchestra.” Imagine the sound of a symphony played by an orchestra where one instrument (e.g. the trumpet) is highly amplified while the other instruments are being muted in their sound volume, and you have a crude metaphor for the metabolic dysregulation induced by excessive carbohydrate consumption – caused hyperinsulinemia.

INSULIN, EICOSANOIDS & cAMP

Eicosanoids are a biologically powerful group of quasi-hormones (technically called “autocrine hormones”) derived from a unique group of polyunsaturated fatty acids containing 20 carbon atoms. Prostaglandins, thromboxanes, leukotrienes, lipoxins and hydroxylated fatty acids are just some of the subclasses of eicosanoids. Autocrine eicosanoids, unlike endocrine hormones, are not secreted by glands, nor do they travel through the bloodstream to reach distant target tissues. Rather they are continuously being produced, in minute quantities, at the local cellular level, “living” and “dying” in seconds.

Eicosanoids are powerful local “biological response modifiers,” or feedback modulators, helping to coordinate/fine-tune cellular reactions. Prostaglandins (PG) of the one-series, derived from the fatty acid gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), are generally considered “good PGs,” while PGs of the two-series (PG2) are considered “bad PGs” – at least when present beyond some bare minimum necessary levels. PG2s are derived from the fatty acid arachidonic acid (AA), which in turn can either be made from GLA or gotten preformed from the diet.

A key property of PGs is their ability to modulate intracellular cAMP levels. “The PGs of the E series are those most implicated in adipose tissue regulation…. PGE1 stimulates adenylate cyclase. The resulting increase in cAMP production ultimately leads to accelerated lipolysis…. PGE2 has an inhibitory effect on adenylate cyclase resulting in a decrease of intracellular cAMP.” (4) “…cyclic AMP is the same second messenger used by a great number of endocrine hormones to translate their biological information to the appropriate target cell. By maintaining adequate cellular levels of [PGE1], you are guaranteed that a certain baseline level of cyclic AMP is always present in a cell. When an additional burst of cyclic AMP is generated by the endocrine hormone interacting with its receptor, it’s now far more likely that the overall cyclic AMP levels in the cell will be high enough to ensure that the appropriate biological response (i.e. better hormonal communication) is produced…. In some ways, the levels of cyclic AMP generated by “good eicosanoids” are like a booster signal to ensure that fewer [cAMP-using] endocrine hormones are necessary to deliver [their] appropriate biological message…. Thus, even with decreasing levels of endocrine hormones, hormonal communication can be maintained….” (7)

Not only does PGE1 boost hyperinsulinemia-suppressed cAMP levels, it also helps control insulin itself. “PGE1 has been found to play a role in insulin secretion and glucose tolerance. The [pancreatic] beta-cell regulation of insulin release is influenced by PGE1. PGE1 inhibits insulin secretion, perhaps by normalizing insulin receptor sensitivity. Low levels of PGE1 have been found in diabetics.” (4)

Considering the pivotal importance of PGE1 and PGE2 for controlling insulin levels, cAMP levels, and for modulating the effect of the age-decreasing levels of most cAMP-using hormones, how then can we gain greater control over our PGE1/PGE2 levels? We can exert dietary/nutrient influence over PGE1/PGE2 at three key points in their production pathways. The first control point involves increasing the effectiveness of the conversion of cis-linoleic acid (a fatty acid common to many vegetable oils) into GLA. The second control point rests upon influencing the fate of the GLA metabolite dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA). DGLA can end up either as “good” PGE1 or “bad” PGE2, depending on whether or not the conversion of DGLA to arachidonic acid is successfully blocked. The third control point comes from restricting the dietary intake of preformed arachadonic acid.

Cis-linoleic acid (CLA) is the chief polyunsaturated fatty acid found in most vegetable oils, such as sunflower, safflower, corn, soy and sesame oils. Yet its only two known functions in the human body are to be burned for fuel (like any fatty acid), or to serve as the substrate to produce GLA. The conversion of CLA to GLA is catalyzed/controlled by the activity of the enzyme delta-6-desaturase (D6D). According to the world’s premier GLA researcher, Dr. David Horrobin, the activity of D6D can be blocked by a host of factors (10) :

1) Trans-fatty acids (common in hydrogenated oils, margarine’s and shortenings)
2) High saturated fat intake
3) Cholesterol
4) Deficiencies of zinc, pyridoxine (vitamin B6), or magnesium
5) Diabetes – i.e. severe insulin deficiency
6) Excessive alcohol intake
7) Aging
8) Oncogenic viruses
9) Chemical carcinogens
10) Ionizing radiation.

Thus avoiding hydrogenated oil/margarine-based “food” products; eating only low-fat meat, poultry and dairy products; minimizing alcohol intake; avoiding chemical additive-containing processed/manufactured (i.e. junk) foods; and taking supplements of zinc (15mg/day), vitamin B6 (10-50mg/day) and magnesium (200-500mg/day), will tend to maximize D6D activity, at least somewhat increasing conversion of CLA to GLA. Vitamin B6 may also aid the conversion of GLA to DGLA for conversion to cAMP-enhancing PGE1. (10) Vitamin C and niacin (vitamin B3) are needed to convert DGLA to PGE1 (10) ; so supplements of C (300-500mg/day, minimum) and B3 (50-100mg/day) may also aid PGE1 formation.

For those who don’t wish to trust their PGE1 manufacture to “temperamental” D6D, supplements of preformed GLA from evening primrose oil, borage oil, or blackcurrant oil may be helpful. Barry Sears claims that over time GLA supplements may become counter-productive, gradually increasing arachidonic acid and anti-cAMP PGE2 more than PGE1. (7) Sears doesn’t mention the need for C and B3 to aid DGLA to PGE1 conversion – this may have affected his clinical results. My own decades-long clinical experience has not generally shown GLA supplements to be problematic, and there is a vast human clinical literature of successful use of GLA in many areas of disease, including showing significant results in treating obesity. (11)

DGLA can be converted to arachidonic acid by the enzyme delta-5-desaturase – normally a reaction better suppressed than permitted. This is the critical control point in nutritional attempts to enhance PGE1 and reduce PGE2. And it turns out that the primary activator of D5D is – insulin! (3,7) The primary hormonal suppressor of D5D is glucagon, (3,7) while the fish-oil fatty acid EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) is also a significant inhibitor of D5D. (3,7) (I take 2-3 capsules twice daily of the sardine oil-derived Kyolic(r)-EPA as part of my own personal anti-D5D regimen.)

Each Kyolic(r)-EPA cap provides 280mg EPA (also 120mg DHA and garlic extract, along with 10mg unesterified vitamin E to prevent rancidity).

The third control point in lowering excessive levels of PGE2 production involves eliminating as much red meat fat as possible from our diets. Feed-lot beef, pork, etc. is rich in arachidonic acid; low-fat range-fed beef, poultry, etc. is low in arachidonic acid, and contains some EPA.

GROWTH HORMONE, TESTOSTERONE, ESTROGEN: THE INSULIN CONNECTION

Growth hormone (GH) and insulin have both complementary and antagonistic properties. GH and insulin are both anabolic – they facilitate the growth of lean body mass – i.e. muscle, organ tissue, tendons, bones, etc. When animals are surgically deprived of both hormones, growth ceases. Giving either GH or insulin alone causes virtually no increase in growth, but giving them both together restores normal growth. (8)

In other ways, these hormones are opposites: GH promotes fat burning/loss, while insulin opposes fat burning and promotes fat gain. “Increased insulin levels and decreased GH levels are characteristic of obesity.” (4) PGE1 suppresses insulin release while PGE1 increases pituitary GH release. (4) Aging pituitaries may still produce adequate GH – it’s the releasing of GH that seems to become problematic with age. Perhaps not surprisingly, GH-releasing hormone requires adequate pituitary cAMP levels to perform its GH-releasing “magic.” (7) Also, a factor that can decrease pituitary GH-production is elevated insulin, which may inhibit GH synthesis. (7) Thus lowering insulin through a low-carbohydrate diet combined with GLA/EPA supplements to enhance PGE1/cAMP levels is a natural way to restore age-declining GH function.

While GH can stimulate fat-burning by itself, it helps to build muscle mass when combined with its normal synergist – testosterone. (7) In both men and women, testosterone is produced through the combined action of pituitary-released follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), acting on the ovaries in women and leydig cells of the testes in men.

Yet both FSH and LH act through the second messenger cAMP. (9) Thus obesity/high carbohydrate diet-elevated insulin will tend to inhibit the testosterone-producing activity of FSH/LH.

The problem doesn’t end there, however. In both men and women, testosterone may be converted to estrogen through an aromatase enzyme. And the aromatase enzyme exists and functions primarily in body fat! Furthermore, estrogen is itself a powerful pro-fat hormone: “In addition to deposition of fat in the breasts and subcutaneous tissues, estrogens cause the deposition of fat in the buttocks and thighs….” (8) Indeed, insulin, estrogen and cortisol are the three primary pro-fat hormones of the human body.

Another threat to normal male testosterone levels is severe, chronic stress. Both testosterone and cortisol are made from the precursor protohormone pregnenolone. Normal daily male testosterone production is 5mg, while 10-20mg of cortisol is produced daily under non-stressed life conditions. (7) The amount of cortisol produced under stress may double, perhaps “stealing” scarce pregnenolone needed for (decreasing with age) testosterone production. As noted earlier, cortisol is extremely pro-fat, and is the chief agent of muscle catabolism (breakdown), directly opposing testosterone’s anabolic muscle-building action.

THE INSULIN – EXERCISE CONNECTION

The late twentieth century Western world has achieved the most sedentary lifestyle for the mass of humanity in all human history. Our sedentary modern world also provides a glutton’s feast of cheap sugar-and starch-rich breads, chips, pastas, cakes, cookies, candy, etc. so abundantly available that even those on welfare can afford to feast on these hyperinsulinemia-promoting carbo-riches. It is perhaps no coincidence that in order to rapidly (and cheaply) fatten cattle and hogs before slaughter, they are confined in crowded feed-lots where the animals have virtually no room to move, while being fed all the carbohydrate-rich grain they can eat.

Modern obese humans routinely suffer from the unique twentieth century “disease” – hypokinesis – i.e. too little bodily movement. The late twentieth century Western epidemic of obesity is as much due to widespread chronic hypokinesis, as it is to the carbohydrate/caloric excess typical of modern humans. Thus Thompson and colleagues note: “Body fat is significantly affected by a program of prescribed exercise in both sexes at all age levels. Exercise has been shown to produce body fat loss without caloric restriction in both animals… and humans…, although the loss is usually more pronounced with caloric restriction.

In fact, reductions in activity level are strongly correlated with body fat increases, even if caloric intake is significantly reduced. In addition, exercise decreases storage fat rather than LBM [lean body mass], whereas dietary interventions [i.e. dieting[ tend to reduce both [body fat and LBM].” (12)

Studies done in the 1970’s with both men and women found that significant body fat loss could be produced simply through a regular (i.e. at least four days/week) long-term walking program, without any dieting. (13,14) “Vigorous regular walking has resulted in reduced body fat stores, reduced… insulin requirements (a 36% decrease in the ratio of insulin/glucose concentration occurred), and [spontaneously] reduced food intake.” (4) A key feature of the essentiality of moderate aerobic exercise, i.e. walking (the primary “natural” form of “exercise” engaged in of necessity by virtually all of humanity prior to the twentieth century) to preventing/reducing obesity is that “exercise increases insulin sensitivity and decreases insulin resistance)….” (15)

The reason for this is quite simple. Actively exercising muscles may take in up to 30 times more blood sugar than they do when at rest, and this cellular uptake of glucose occurs without insulin! (7,8) Thus walking provides the body with an alternative method to remove excess glucose from the bloodstream without the usual need for insulin secretion. Taking a brisk long walk 30-60 minutes after a large meal may help blunt the otherwise inevitable massive insulin surge large (carbohydrate-rich) meals normally induce.

THE ANTI-INSULIN PROGRAM

1) Seriously reduce (better yet, eliminate) from the diet all processed, refined, junk food, high sugar (sucrose, fructose, glucose), high white flour “foods”: bread, pasts, cake, pie, candy, ice cream, crackers, cereal, corn/potato chips, snack bars, waffles/pancakes, soft drinks, doughnuts, sweet syrups, ad infinitum.

2) Minimize intake of salt, especially salty carbohydrate-foods: pretzels, chips, crackers, etc. “Salt increases plasma glucose and insulin response to starchy foods.” (4)

3) Increase glucagon – stimulating with lean protein: low-fat (ideally range-fed, organic) beef, lamb, chicken. turkey, fish etc.

4) Reduce carbohydrate-intake from the typical American/British levels of 250-400 grams/day to 75-150 grams/day. These carbohydrates should be mainly vegetables, with small amounts of brown rice, millet, beans, almonds, pumpkin seeds and other unrefined, high-fibre natural foods.

5) Take 40-60 minute brisk walks, 4-6 days/week. Avoid walking in highly polluted areas and/or times of day, as toxins from auto exhaust may inhibit mitochondrial burning of fuel (i.e. fat) for energy.

6) Take various supplements discussed in this article – e.g. C, B6, B3, Zinc, Magnesium, GLA, EPA, etc.

ADDITIONAL NUTRITIONAL/PHARMACOLOGIC AIDS TO FAT LOSS/INSULIN REDUCTION

1) Chromium Picolinate.
This form of chromium is well absorbed, and has been shown in various animal and human studies to aid in fat loss while at least modestly enhancing lean body mass. (16) “The ability of chromium picolinate to enhance insulin responsiveness has been demonstrated in rat myoblast cell cultures. 72-h pre-incubation with chromium picolinate (50ng Cr/ml) resulted in a 60% increase in insulin binding, and markedly enhanced glucose and leucine uptake….” (16) Dosage: 200mcg Chromium (as picolinate) two or three times daily for women; 200mcg three times daily or 400mcg twice daily for men.

2) Obesity, aging, chronic dieting, genetics, lack of exercise and lack of cold exposure may all lead to “subclinical” hypothyroidism, often involving deficient conversion of less active T4 to T3. T3 decreases the activity of D5D, reducing pro-insulin PGE2, just as do glucagon and EPA. (7) T3 also stimulates fat burning. (4) Ideally one should use T3 (Cytomel) only under a physician’s care and guidance, but those who fit the low-thyroid profile and suffer from chronic obesity and fatigue, and who are willing to take practical, moral and legal responsibility for their own actions, may wish to experiment with modest doses of T3 – i.e., 2-3 mcg once or twice daily, taken morning and/or early afternoon. T3 is fast/short-acting, and most effects will be gone within 24 hours or less. Nonetheless, there is some risk here – caveat emptor! Heart palpitations, excessive sweating, racing thoughts, headaches, irritability, and insomnia are all hints – it’s not for you! Those with known or suspected (past or present) hyperthyroidism, even if obese, should not use T3 without a doctor’s care. Similarly those with any other serious disease states – especially heart arrhythmia’s/heart disease – should be extremely cautious in T3 use.

3) Anti-cortisol states.
Since cortisol levels tend to increase with age (and stress), and since cortisol promotes both obesity and insulin resistance, this is a key strategy to normalize weight/insulin levels. DHEA, (7) and high dose vitamin C (17) may all help lower elevated cortisol levels. DHEA: 10-50mg A.M. Gerovital-H3: 100mg A.M. Dilantin (Phenytoin) 25-50mg at bedtime. Vitamin C: 500-1000mg 3-4 times daily.

4) L-Tryptophan/5-Hydroxytryptophan.
Several human studies with 5HTP, the precursor of serotonin, have found good weight loss results with 5HTP. (18,19) There is evidence that some humans compulsively snack on carbohydrate foods to feel better. The large insulin releases generated by such “carbo-bingeing” preferentially increase tryptophan/serotonin in the brain, temporarily reducing anxiety and depression in such people. (20) By providing an alternative, non-insulin-driven way to increase brain serotonin, L-Tryptophan, supplements may help reduce weight not only by reducing total caloric intake, but especially by reducing carbohydrate intake, thus lessening hyper-insulinemia/insulin resistance. In the 1992 Italian study (19), 300mg/5HTP supplements may help reduce weight not only by reducing total caloric intake, but especially by reducing carbohydrate intake, thus lessening hyperinsulinemia/insulin resistance. In the 1992 Italian study, (19) 300mg 5HTP 3 times daily before meals reduced women’s caloric intake over a twelve week period from 3232 cal/day to 1273 cal/day, while reducing carbohydrate intake from 350gm/day to 150gm/day. Weight dropped an average of eleven pounds. (The study did use special enteric-coated 5HTP capsules to prevent gut irritation) Ed [IAS provides same Italian 5HTP]. Taking 1000-1500mg L-Tryptophan at bedtime, or 50-100mg 5HTP before meals may reduce carbohydrate-craving and intake.

5) Pro-GH supplements.
As noted earlier, PGE1 may enhance GH release. so all the PGE1-enhancing nutrients (GLA, EPA, B3, B6, C, zinc, magnesium) may be helpful here. Hydergine has been shown to increase GH-release in the elderly with long-term usage at 1.5mg every 6 hours. (21) The authors of this study also note that bromocryptine (Parlodel) may also enhance adult GH-release. They also note that the enhanced pituitary GH-release from Hydergine seems to be related to an increase in brain (hypothalamic) dopamine status, which normally declines (often precipitously) with age. Thus the dopamine-enhancing agent Deprenyl may also be useful as part of a GH-restoration program.

6) Mitochondrial energizers and protectants.
In a healthy human, storage fat is at a minimum and sooner or later all fat-dietary, body-manufactured, and storage fat – ends up as “fuel for the furnace” – i.e. the trillions of mitochondrial “power plants ” found in most of our cells. Vitamins B1, B2, B3, B5 (pantothenic acid), and biotin, as well as NADH, alpha-lipoic acid, CoQ10/Idebenone, magnesium and manganese are all necessary “spark plugs” to facilitate burning fat and sugar for energy. 10-100mg B1, B2, B3, 50-200mg B5, 1-10mg biotin, 5-20mg NADH, 50-300mg alpha-lipoic acid, 60-300mg CoQ10 and/or 45-135mg Idebenone, 200-500mg magnesium, and 3-10mg managanese may optimize mitochondrial energy cycles. Since the mitochondrial structures inevitably generate massive amounts of free radicals in turning fuel into energy, and since these structures are rich in easily rancidified polyunsaturated fatty acids, a panoply of antioxidants – e.g. 100-400 IU vitamin E, 500-2000mg vitamin C, 100-200mcg selenium, 50-300mg alpha-lipoic acid, 500-1000mg N-acetyl Cysteine, 2mg copper as copper sebacate (SOD-mimetic), 50-100mg grape seed extract/pycnogenol, 300-500mg silymarin – may help protect the essential “fat burning furnaces.” In addition, 1gm L-carnitine twice daily on an empty stomach may facilitate fat burning – carnitine is the “shuttle molecule” that “escorts” fatty acids into mitochondria where they are then oxidized. (22) Acetyl L-carnitine may also be a useful mitochondrial regenerator – mitochondria become progressively deformed and dysfunctional with aging. Dosage: 1-3gms/day. Ward Dean suggests this dose can be half L-carnitine and half Acetyl L-carnitine to achieve successful mitochondrial regeneration. (23)

7) Caffeine.
Caffeine, whether from coffee or as a “drug”, has many benefits for aiding fat loss. However, excessive doses (probably 300mg/day and up, on average) may pose risks of “caffeinism”, with such symptoms as headaches, restlessness, irritability, insomnia, anxiety, excessive urination, gut irritation, heart palpitations, and muscle tremors. (15) A thermogenic/fat burning dose is probably 100-200mg daily – i.e. the equivalent of one to two cups of coffee/day, or two to four cups made with half decaf and half regular. Caffeine taken with a meal may induce increased thermogenesis – burning fat to make heat. (15) It may increase resting metabolic rate – our resting metabolism burns 60-70% of our total daily energy consumption. (15) Caffeine preadministration 45-60 minutes before exercise has been shown to spare liver/muscle glycogen and to enhance fatty acid burning in humans. (24) Caffeine taken after at least an eight hour fast, i.e. in the morning after arising, may be especially effective when combined with a 40-60 minute brisk walk, to enhance burning of stored body fat. (24)

NOTE

This review of anti-aging weight loss has of course only scratched the surface of this amazingly complex and multi-pronged issue. Nonetheless, it is my deeply-held belief, derived from clinical and personal experience combined with a 30 year continuous reading of the medical/scientific literature, that the combination of hypokinesis, excessive carbohydrate consumption (especially of the sugar and white flour junk food variety), hyperinsulinemia/insulin resistance, excessive PGE2/inadequate PGE1 and hypo-cAMP status, is the core of the modern epidemic of refractory, chronic obesity. The interested reader is strongly urged to read references 1, 3, 7, and 15 for a much more detailed coverage of these and other related issues.

REFERENCES

1) R. Atkins: Dr. Atkins’ New Diet Revolution. NYC: M. Evans & Co., 1999

2) J. Hardman, Et Al (eds): Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmalogical Basis Of Therapeutics. Nyc: Mcgraw-Hill, 1996.

3) M.R. Eades & M.D. Eades: Protein Power. NYC: Bantam, 1999.

4) E. Heleniak & B. Aston: “Prostaglandins, Brown Fat And Weight Loss.” Med Hypoth 1989, 28:13-33.

5) M.R. Taskinen & E. Nikkila: “Liipoprotein Lipase Of Adipose Tissue & Skeletal Muscle In Human Obesity” Metabolism 1981, 30:810-17.

6) S. Reiser: “Physiological Differences Between Starches And Sugars” In Medical Applications Of Clinical Nutrition, J. Bland, Ed. New Canaan: Keats, 1983. Pp. 133-177.

7) B. SEARS: THE ANTI-AGING ZONE. NYC: REGAN/HARPER COLLINS, 1999.

8) A. GUYTON: TEXTBOOK OF MEDICAL PHYSIOLOGY. PHILADELPHIA: W.B. SAUNDERS, 1981.

9)  R. Pike & M. Brown: Nutrition – An Integrated Approach. NYC: Macmillan, 1984.

10)  D. Horrobin: “the Importance Of Gamma-linolenic Acid And Prostaglandin E1 In Human Nutrition And Medicine” J Hol Med 1981, 3:118-139.

11) M. WERBACH: NUTRITIONAL INFLUENCES ON ILLNESS. TARZANA: THIRD LINE PRESS, 1996. PP.459-63.

12) J. THOMPSON ET AL: “EXERCISE AND OBESITY:ETIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND INTERVENTION” PSYCH BULL 1982, 91: 55-79.

13) G. GWINUP: “EFFECT OF EXERCISE ALONE ON THE WEIGHT OF OBESE WOMEN” ARCH INT MED 1975, 135: 676-80.

14) A. LEON ET AL: “EFFECTS OF A VIGOROUS WALKING PROGRAM ON BODY COMPOSITION, AND…METABOLISM OF OBESE YOUNG MEN.” J CLIN NUTR 1979, 32:1776-87.

15) D. MOWREY: FAT MANAGEMENT – THE THERMOGENIC FACTOR. LEHI, UT: VICTORY PUB., 1994.

16) M. McCARTY: “HOMOLOGOUS PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF PHENFORMIN AND CHROMIUM PICOLINATE” MED HYPOTH 1993, 41: 316-24.

17) J. SOUTH: GH3, THE ORIGINAL ANTI-AGING DRUG AND STILL ONE OF THE BEST!” IAS BULLETIN, 3 (2):1997.

18) F. CECI & C. CANGIANO ET AL: “THE EFFECTS OF ORAL 5-HYDROXYTRYPTOPHAN ADMINISTRATION ON FEEDING BEHAVIOR IN OBESE ADULT FEMALE SUBJECTS” J NEURAL TRANSM 1989, 76: 109-17.

19) C. CANGIANO & F. CECI ET AL: EATING BEHAVIOR AND ADHERENCE TO DIETARY PRESCRIPTIONS IN OBESE ADULT SUBJECTS TREATED WITH 5-HYDROXYTRYPTOPHAN” AM J CLIN NUTR 1992, 56: 863-67.

20) J. WURTMAN: “CARBOHYDRATE CRAVING, MOOD CHANGES AND OBESITY” J CLIN PSYCHIAT (SUPPLEMENT), 1988, 49: 37-9.

21) E. ROLANDI ET AL: “CHANGES OF PITUITARY SECRETION AFTER LONG-TERM TREATMENT WITH HYDERGINE, IN ELDERLY PATIENTS” ACTA ENDOCRIN 1983, 102: 332-36.

22) M. McCARTY: “PROMOTION OF HEPATIC LIPID OXIDATION AND GLUCONEOGENESIS AS A STRATEGY FOR APPETITE CONTROL” MED HYPOTH 1994, 42: 215-25.

23) W. DEAN: “ACETYL-L-CARNITINE – THE REJUVENATING EFFECTS” IAS BULLETIN 3 (4):1998.

24) M. McCARTY: “OPTIMIZING EXERCISE FOR WEIGHT LOSS” MED HYPOTH 1995, 44: 325-30

BRAIN PRODUCTS
Order Acetyl L-Carnitine 500 mg 60 caps $9.99
Order Alpha GPC + 50mcg Huperzine A 300 mg 60 caps $9.99
Order Aniracetam 750 mg 30 caps $19.99
Order CDP-Choline + 50mcg Huperzine A 200 mg 60 caps $19.99
Order Centrophenoxine + 50mcg Huperzine A 250 mg 60 caps $19.99
Order Galantamine 8 mg 60 caps $39.99
Order Idebenone         4 bottles @ $20 45 mg 60 caps $23.99
Order Oxiracetam 750 mg 30 caps $23.99
Order Phosphatidylserine   6 bottles @ $18 100 mg 60 caps $29.99
Order Piracetam 800 mg 60 caps $14.99
Order Get SmartTM as reported in Wired 779 mg 60 caps $55.99
Get Smart

ingredients in 2 capsules
Aniracetam 768 mg improves creativity and critical thinking
Centrophenoxine 400 mg improves focus and concentration
CDP Choline 200 mg improves focus and concentration
Gastrodin 140 mg regenerates brain function
Oxiracetam 40 mg improves creativity and critical thinking
Noopept 13 mg is neuroprotective – improves memory
Vinpocetine 8 mg increases ATP within the brain’s neurons
Galantamine 320 mcg improves focus and concentration
Huperzine A 200 mcg improves focus and concentration
Autism – Parents have discovered that Get Smart brain formula helps their autistic children. Read comments from parents at www.regardingcaroline.com/smart